NEW THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE FLOW PARAMETERS IN THE TRANSITION AND SMOOTH REGIMES
Abstract
Transition and smooth flows are often encountered during experiments in the laboratory and even sometimes in the field. The transition domain occupies a fairly large space in Moody's diagram while the smooth flow is reduced to a curve which represents the lower envelope of the diagram. The characteristic length corresponding to these two domains, such as the width of a channel or the flow depth, is currently calculated by an iterative process such as the trial and error method. To overcome this drawback, the present study presents a direct method consisting of first calculating the characteristic length in the domain assumed to be rough. The characteristic length sought is equal to this length corrected for effects of a dimensionless correction coefficient. In the transition domain, the correction coefficient depends both on the Reynolds number and on the relative roughness corresponding to the rough domain while for the smooth regime the correction coefficient depends only on the Reynolds number in the rough zone. Expressions for Reynolds numbers in the transition and smooth domains are also presented. The governing relationships are practical and differ from those usually found in the literature. Practical numerical examples are provided to show both how the method should be applied and the evidence for its reliability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACHOUR B., AMARA L. (2020). Manning’s Roughness Coefficient in a trapezoidal-Shaped Channel, Technical Note, Larhyss Journal, No. 44, pp. 89-96.
ACHOUR B., BEDJAOUI A. (2006). Discussion of “Exact solutions for normal depth problem” by Swamee P.K., and Rathie P.N., Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 715–717.
BOYD J.P. (1998). Global approximations to the principal real-valued branch of the Lambert W-function, Applied Mathematics Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 6, pp.27-31.
CHOW V.T. (1959). Open-channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 680p.
COLEBROOK C.F. (1938–1939). Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws, Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp.: 133–156.
CORLESS R.M., GOMET G.H., HARE, D.E.G., JEFFREY D.J., KNUTH, D.E. (1996). On the Lambert W function, Advances in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp.329–359.
DARCY H. (1854) On experimental research relating to the movement of water in pipes (In French), Minutes of the sessions of the Academy of Sciences, No. 38, pp. 1109-1121, doi:10.1680/ijoti.1939.13150.
HAGER W.H. (1987). Computation of turbulent conduit flows, 3R International, Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 116-121.
KEMLER E. (1933). A Study of the Data on the Flow of Fluid in Pipes, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 55, No Hyd-55-2, pp. 7–32.
MOODY L.F. (1944). Friction factors for pipe flow, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 66, Issue 8, pp. 671–684.
NIKURADZE J. (1933). Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes, V.D.I. Research booklet, Berlin, No.361, pp. 1-22. These show in detail the transition region for pipes with high relative roughness (ε / D > 0.001), In German.
PIGOTT R.J.S. (1933). The Flow of Fluids in Closed Conduits, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 55, pp. 497–501.
ROUSE H. (1943). Evaluation of Boundary Roughness, Proceedings Second Hydraulic Conference, University of Iowa Bulletin 27.
SINNIGER R.O., HAGER W.H. (1989). Hydraulic constructions: stationary flows, Civil engineering treaty of the Federal Polytechnic of Lausanne (In French), Switzerland. Zeghadnia L., Robert J.L., Achour B. (2019). Explicit Solutions for Turbulent Flow Friction Factor: A Review, Assessment and Approaches Classification, Ain Shams Engineering Journal., Vol.10, Issue 1, pp.243-252.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.